hillnsa.blogg.se

The comparison is lack of a column: total file size of the installation/package, which is an important factor of portability. Wikivek ( talk) 17:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC) Even more general context is needed, like mentioning the main article in the lead! More work still to go. The correct information is here: and in the manual. (Rewriting my comment here as nobody had replied) The article is not very clear on what is meant by a client. Almo2001 ( talk) 20:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC) What kind of client The dates in their current format don't sort well, so I can't just sort on release dates to see which are the most current ones. ALoopingIcon ( talk) 15:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC) In the table there is the version number but there is not a "Last stable release Date" that is a quite decent approximation of how 'alive' is the tool.Įventually I will start to add it. So I renamed the section to "comparison matrix." -Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.13.177.205 ( talk) 19:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC) Missing a date column There weren't enough actual features being compared. Meld has no installation notice for Windows OS.Ĭybersapien ( talk) 09:59, 31 October 2009 (UTC) Not a feature matrix

Mohrr ( talk) 11:04, 17 July 2008 (UTC) Meld on Microsoft Windows OS

This should show which version of the subversion library the client links against-that would provide, however indirectly, a good overview of the capabilities of the client.

W Nowicki ( talk) 21:43, 29 October 2011 (UTC) subversion library version Needs work converting the inline links to citations. Yes, seems like it has one now, at least a start.

This is not a Comparison of Subversion clients as the title would lead one to believe.Ī matrix of available features would be a good thing